Non-Fiction
The New Optimism
Opinion: The New Optimism
By Gabriela Kalter
(originally published for www.breakthruradio.com)
As dinner with a friend came to a close at a local Chinese restaurant, we were presented with the check along with a plate of orange wedges and two complimentary fortune cookies. Retrieving the scrap of paper from inside the crunchy dessert has never been my favorite part of the meal, but I reached for the cookie out of some enigmatic respect for tradition and proceeded with the routine table reading of my blue-fonted fortune: "The best way to predict the future is to create it."
My reaction wasn't all that surprising, I guess. Snorting with disgust at the fortune's cheeriness and positivity, I wondered how such a cheesy sentiment could be expected to inspire anything but a feeling of ridiculous irritation. It seemed so general and impersonal. "Creating your future" just represented all that idealistic crap that is always so much easier said than done. All I could think of was the poor schmuck that wrote this, sitting by a shitty typewriter (or however they make those things) wondering what happened to their dreams of becoming a great poet or novelist. There's no way that this was the future they had dreamed of creating for themselves.
I ate the cookie and, chewing with anger, thought how stupid it seemed to learn the word "lettuce" in Chinese. I couldn't even have a full exchange with a grocer with that level of fluency. I hated both sides of my fortune, but ironically, I was thoroughly enjoying the taste of the cookie. I was then overcome with a deep sense of guilt, which carried me to the parking lot, into my car and back home.
When had I become such a curmudgeon? I took a lighthearted activity and dragged it to the pits of my inner darkness. And why? I've been the recipient of much more infuriating fortunes, but for whatever reason this one got under my skin. It somehow simplified this positive approach to life, one that I find to be a real struggle. I felt like the fortune needed a footnote explaining all of the obstacles that the world presents on the way to creating your future.
I feel a similar frustration towards the Nike slogan, "just do it." It's so direct, as if "just doing it" is so simple and easy. You don't think that if I thought I could "just do it" then I would have done it already? Life is harder than that, Nike! All of these oversimplified, short sentences that were meant to be encouraging only felt like they were mocking me and my struggle with becoming a full-fledged, functional member of society.
In Defense of Cynicism
It's easy to be cynical, expected even. In this post-modern society of existential angst, we are taught to question everything. We're encouraged to be skeptical. In fact, if you readily accept anything too prematurely, you'll likely be regarded as an unthinking conformist with no intellectual capability or self-knowledge. We are a diverse society that hosts a variety of backgrounds and cultures. Further, the range of choices available to us can be overwhelming. In a world where truth is subjective and structure is contrived, it seems that nothing is absolute or inherently certain. Who do we trust? What can we believe in?
Nihilism becomes a viable alternative to committing to any specific ideologies, and a state of such uncertainty can lead to indifference, apathy, and consequentially cynicism. It's instinctual to reject. We're wary of accepting anything as true because we're afraid of limiting ourselves. Once we subscribe to any belief system, we risk being labeled, grouped, and then judged based off of this social categorization. How can we be positive when we're so distrustful of everyone and everything?
Optimism is a struggle. Anyone who tells you differently is lying to you. Either that, or they're on some kind of hallucinogenic drug, in which case, ask them if they are willing to share and to please get in touch with me immediately. In a nation of individualists, rife with competition and capitalistic leaps toward success, life can feel lonely and dark.
Our media is saturated with negative news, run by fear mongering propagandists who coax young minds into avoiding human connection for risk of contracting the latest disease or being exploited by sexual deviants, human traffickers, serial killers, etc. If it's not a devastating school shooting, it's the economic collapse or the cutthroat job market making headlines. Positivity is less frequently broadcast, not as urgently recognized. Why is it that biting digs are always easier to remember than the compliments? Why aren't acts of human kindness considered as news worthy as the unfortunate marks of evil?
Being raised in this day and age has altered the sense of stability felt in previous generations. Generation Y, or millennials, have been hesitant to acclimate to the issues of the day, leading to a sense of disconnected defensiveness, which gives way to the ethos of irony. Professor and researcher Christy Wampole discussed the indirectness of irony in her highly criticized New York Times op-ed "How to Live Without Irony," published last year. She generalized today's youth in her disdain for the hipster culture and how their roots in irony have cultivated an irresponsible avoidance of real life.
As a millennial with a tendency to be pessimistic, I feel a need to justify our generation's use of irony and cynicism as a coping mechanism. Wampole is correct in citing irony as a mode of self-defense. It's a way of remaining at a distance, a way to avoid true rejection and preserve self-esteem. We feel a need to protect ourselves because we are distrustful. We are bombarded with information and so many people feel that it is safer to be disaffected from it all.
Cynicism thrives on the mentality of being a victim. It is a cynic who believes that they have no control over their lives, that external forces and luck are responsible for their fate and to try for anything is a waste of time and energy. When the majority of media content focuses on events that are largely out of our hands, it's instinctual to take on an outlook of helplessness and hopelessness.
So, Wampole's observation of a generation oozing with irony is a legitimate one. But, her tone lacks understanding and compassion when the state of today's youth makes sense. We are brought up with expectations that cannot be met in the increasingly competitive world. A world where everyone is fighting to be number one: to have the most money, the biggest house, the fastest car, the most impressive job, the newest gadgets, etc. We become jaded over time as our expectations are not met and our disappointments pile up along with our school loans and prescriptions for anti-depressants.
Even though we are expected to be happier because of increased opportunities and access to information, it is precisely these advancements that leave us overwhelmed with expectations that are much too high and a sense of security and stability that is much too low.
The New Sincerity
It is of course unfair to generalize an entire generation as depressed and cynical hipsters. Wampole's article received a lot of disapproval, including a notable response "Sincerity Not Irony is Our Age's Ethos" by Jonathan D. Fitzgerald in The Atlantic. He criticizes Wampole for claiming that irony is the ethos of our entire generation when in fact he believes we are headed towards a more authentic era full of hope and honesty.
He cites a cultural movement known as 'The New Sincerity,' which he asserts began in the 1980s and is characterized by a shift in attitude towards pop cultural appreciation and approach to consumerism. It largely revolves around a rejection of irony and a celebration of authenticity, joy, connection, and all things awesome. It emerged as a counterculture of the punk and grunge movements, which were driven by ambivalence and dark irony in an age of rebellion and wasted youth.
Though elements of this darkness are still prevalent today, 'The New Sincerity' is an encouraging shift from hopelessness to a focus on genuine appreciation of the joie de vivre. A strong proponent of this ethos is Jesse Thorn who hosts the American public radio show known as "Bullseye" (formerly "The Sound of Young America"). His vision spawned into a production organization and podcast network known as Maximum Fun, which promotes joyful appreciation and celebration of awesomeness. Thorn views the movement as a fusion of irony and sincerity in an effort to create something honest and more reflective of our times. It is not without struggle and darkness, but it aims to overcome the preoccupation with negativity and embrace uncertainty, allowing it to take us someplace real.
The popularity of 'The New Sincerity' is evident in the refreshing works of music and film that are rooted in the movement. Filmmaker Wes Anderson tends to be cited as a notable pioneer of the movement for creating work with a distinct aura of melancholic beauty. His most recent film, Moonrise Kingdom is a celebration of innocence and return to a lost purity. It's quaint and romantic, but at the same time it's modern and clever. Similarly, Zach Braff has been referenced as an artistic figure of 'The New Sincerity.' His movie Garden State is an example of freshness and authenticity derived from the pain of real life and tragedy. Beauty and hope emerge from a place of suffering, and this speaks directly to the message of this cultural movement.
Music has also seen a wave of artists of a similar mentality. Groups like Mumford and Sons, Iron and Wine, Fleet Foxes, and Of Monsters and Men are just a few that represent the reach for sentimentality. It's not enough to be angry or sad. Those are static plateaus to exist on, not just artistically but also psychologically.
Don't be a Negatron, Be an Optimus Prime
We may believe that cynicism is a useful self-defense tactic, a protection against the harsh realities of life, and sure, it can be in certain circumstances. But, by always being cynical we are only closing ourselves off from joy and connection in a world where there is so much goodness to experience.
'The New Sincerity' is about combining the roughness of reality with the necessary desire to find hope and joy. Wanting to be happy is okay. There is no shame in positivity. It doesn't make you naive or stupid. It's a choice to live brightly and richly. Reaching for beauty despite of, or in spite of, all the dark truths in the world is the essence that I derive from this new sincerity. The overarching goal of authenticity will result from a genuine effort to reach for truth and meaning in a world where it's easy to believe they don't exist.
I used to believe that ignorance was bliss, and that if you were smart and aware of the world around you, there was no choice but to be a pessimist. Cynicism made you smart and anyone who was happy was clearly off their rocker. But, I was wrong. What really makes you smart is being able to acknowledge the negativity around you and persist in moving beyond it, finding meaning and happiness, finding joy and hope amidst all the overwhelming negativity; thriving and living and battling pessimistic tendencies.
It's so much cooler to inspire and be inspired, to care about life, feel feelings, and connect to people than it is to reject and isolate yourself from the world. We have to get over the fear of rejection and failure. Embracing our uncertainty is the first step. Striving to find substance that appeals to our originality will be our salvation from the darkness and discontent of cynicism.
Being negative is tired. It's boring and it's played out. It's expected. In this one-upping culture of being the hippest and doing the newest, it's time to pave the path of optimism. That's the deepest and most intelligent of all mentalities.
Half Empty or Half Full?
In my coax for optimism, I'm not rendering pessimism totally useless. It has its place, just like anything does. Without the bad, there would be no good. If there was no darkness, then what does that make light? There is no optimism without pessimism. In order to see the brighter side of any situation there has to be a gloomier one and it is only in this ability to recognize the emptiness of the glass that we can fully understand the fullness of it.
In the end, it's about balance. We all have the potential to be an optimist or a pessimist, I only wish that the former were more frequently channeled and the latter wasn't such a driving force in our daily lives. The true beauty of being human is our complexity. The brilliance lies in our capacity to embody so many emotions and layers of behavior. It's how we choose to access these layers that determines who we are. We hold the power to tweak our frame of mind, which in turn alters the way we function in and interact with the world around us. This ability to live the life we've always wanted is reason enough to be optimistic. There's so much goodness to be seen, it's up to us to open our eyes.
It's worth mentioning the fortune that my friend found in her cookie at the end of our Chinese feast. Her fortune said, "Do not let ambitions overshadow small success." This is an appropriately comforting counter fortune to the one that I received. Yes, life is hard and creating your future is easier said than done, but the joy lies in the appreciation of the little things. Do not let ambitions overshadow small success. Do not forget to be optimistic and happy about where you are so far. Crossing the finish line shouldn't blind you from enjoying the race. How's that for a fortune?
They Said They'd Be There For Me
Chicken Skin
"They Said They'd Be There For Me"
By Gabriela Kalter
(originally published for www.breakthruradio.com)
Chicken Skin is a new pop culture column to BreakThru Radio that contemplates the deeper meaning, if any, to what is, or was ever, popular. For our inaugural edition, Gabriela Kalter discusses her miseducation in adulthood via the '90s smash sitcom.
~~~
It's been almost 10 years since the series finale of Friends aired on NBC, but thanks to my kickass DVD collection and broadcast syndication on the likes of Nick at Night and TBS, I get to hang out with these besties pretty regularly. Monica, Chandler, Ross, Rachel, Phoebe, and Joey have always been very reliable friends, showing up on my TV screen with the simple click of a remote. They're always around, always hanging out, making jokes, drinking coffee, and sitting in Central Perk on their favorite green velour couch, right where I always need them to be.
Of course, I know they aren't real. They're fictionalized sitcom characters that were created with a strategically developed dynamic to ensure good ratings and continued support from the network. And while I'm able to intellectually acknowledge this fact, the gang always seemed so real to me, like I was hanging out with my own best friends and cracking up alone in the living room as the laugh track blared between jokes.
Friends created this world of comfort for not only the characters to live in, but for the audience to lose themselves in as well. The six friends were each other's family in a big scary world where it's so easy to feel alone. And maybe the six twenty somethings living in the Big Apple wouldn't have really been friends with 12-year-old me sitting in New Jersey snacking on Gushers and Fruit Roll Ups, but there was no way for them to ever actually reject me and that was a good enough criterion for me to somehow feel like I was part of that world.
Yet subscribing to these fictionalized ideas of friendship has proven to be colossally idiotic. The reality of the world that Monica, Chandler, Ross, Rachel, Phoebe, and Joey live in requires a significant suspension of disbelief on the viewers' part, and if you are going to successfully separate that cozy Friends world from real life, there are some very important differences to keep in mind.
Number one, if you want to enter someone else's apartment, you have to knock. This is a big one. Since the premiere of the pilot in 1994, Friends seemed to operate under the obscure notion that if you wanted to visit a friend's apartment, whether it's across the hall or across the street, no one had to knock. Monica definitely suffered the brunt of such misguided social behavior as her apartment became the headquarters of sorts. Across the hall from Joey and Chandler (and later, Joey and Rachel), Monica's apartment easily saw the most foot traffic and visitors who almost never seemed to knock.
The barge-through-the-door move was such a staple and a true cementation of the comfort that the friends felt with each other. It's a beautiful homage to the loving bond between the six of them, (blah, blah, blah).
But, real life doesn't work like that. Real life has boundaries. Real life people love their boundaries, especially New Yorkers. So, don't be fooled like I was. It's not okay to open people's doors at your leisure. I don't care if you're bored or lonely or what, and neither do the people on the other side of that door that you're barging into. (Sorry to the people in my freshman dorm.)
This brings me to my next unrealistic social practice gleaned from Friends. Grown-ups have to show up to work. If you're living in the village in a spacious apartment, there's no way you're not going to show up at work as much as it seemed the Friends gang didn't have to. Monica was a chef, Ross was a Professor of Paleontology, Rachel worked at Bloomingdale's (and later Ralph Lauren), Chandler computed numbers or something, Phoebe was a massage therapist and street guitarist, and Joey was an untalented (sorry) actor with a short run on Days of Our Lives and some shitty parts in small plays.
Despite the periodic mention of Monica's apartment being rent controlled, there's just no way that she (or the rest of them) would have gotten by considering the amount of time they spent hanging out at Central Perk compared to the amount of time they spent at work.
Real adults who can afford to live a comfortable NYC lifestyle are at their jobs working most of the time rather than chatting with their friends at 11am on a Tuesday at the local coffee shop. And sure, we would see the friends at their respective jobs in various episodes, but the fact is, there were just too many weekday afternoons that were spent playing hooky from work and drinking coffee.
Something else you should know - You will never get to sit on the same couch every time you enter your local coffee shop, especially if that couch is seemingly the largest, most spacious, most comfortable couch in the entire joint. I mean literally every time? They always got that couch and there was always at least one of them sitting in Central Perk just under the assumption that the others would soon arrive. Did they ever call each other and plan to meet there? Or was it always coincidental that they all showed up to hang out together? And I know that Gunther was in love with Rachel, but does that mean he reserved the big comfy couch for her and her friends to occupy every single time they entered the cafe? Also, I feel like there are a lot more bars and uncomfortable dark club situations in your twenties than Friends would have us believe.
There is also no way in hell that Monica was once an overweight chubster. We are supposed to somehow believe that Courtney Cox was once an overeating fatty? You can tell she's just naturally skinny and always has been. The 'used to be fat' things just always seemed like a bit of a stretch to me. On top of it all, we're supposed to believe that she dropped all of that weight in one year, between the Thanksgiving where Chandler said she was fat and the next Thanksgiving where she sought out revenge and in an effort to embarrass Chandler like he embarrassed her, she ends up chopping off one of his toes. (Great episode by the way.)
But seriously, in one year? Maybe this is why my impression of weight loss and the time line of seeing actual results in severely skewed. Thanks Monica. Not only will I never think I'm skinny enough, but I will feel even worse knowing how far you've come in comparison.
With ten consistently entertaining seasons, (quiet to all you Friends haters, I will never quite understand where you're coming from) there was never a dull moment. Despite the laugh tracks, the sometimes intrusive popularity of the show, and the fact the Matt LeBlanc's spinoff Joey was a total disaster, Friends holds a very special place in my heart.
The world of the sitcom is understandably skewed, I guess it's up to us as the viewers to accept that and make a very clear distinction between the world of the show and the world we actually live in. To leave you with even more to think about, here are some additional observations regarding the unrealistic behaviors and social interactions of our beloved (fictional) pals on Friends.
If you are an out of work actor like Joey, you probably won't score a two bedroom apartment in the village. Also, I felt like Joey was almost too dumb sometimes. Like, how had he gotten this far in life being this stupid?
If you don't have a friend who's a chef like Monica, you should probably learn to cook for yourself. Also, Monica totally spoiled her friends by always cleaning and hosting and taking in Rachel when she ran out on her wedding even though they hadn't spoken in years. I don't think that these kind of magical people actually exist.
If you're a weirdo, ex-convict like Phoebe who used to live on the streets after her mother committed suicide, and once had a pimp spit in her mouth, it's probably going to be a lot harder to find a normal group of friends than the show would have you believe.
If you and your sibling don't have a relationship like Monica and Ross, don't think you aren't as close. In fact, at times it may be for the best to maintain a separate group of friends. As a kid, I would make my brother promise me that we would grow up to be like Monica and Ross, but I don't quite think they're who we should be aspiring towards.
If you can see ugly naked guy in his apartment all of the time, then he can also see you. Knowing that he is naked most of the time with the ability to see into your apartment should be more alarming and uncomfortable than portrayed on the show.
Life is way messier and more uncomfortable than these friends make it seem. Sometimes we are going to feel super alone and we won't have Monica across the hall to make us a lasagna or homemade jam or truffles. We just have to lift our heads and be our own best friend sometimes.
Ridiculous Riders
Ridiculous Riders
By Gabriela Kalter
(originally published for www.breakthruradio.com)
Ah, the perks of the rich and famous: private jets, personal assistants, designer threads, huge endorsement deals, and... fresh toilet seats? Yes, among the list of demands required for performance by the one and only Madonna is a brand new toilet seat upon her arrival at any given venue. The disposable paper lining won't cut it for this material girl; she wants nothing less than the shine of fresh, untouched porcelain against her delicate derriere.
If this sounds crazy, that's probably because it is. I guess being an international pop sensation somehow warrants stipulations of such high maintenance; the list of peculiar celebrity demands most certainly doesn't end there. From food choice to furniture and everything in between, the specifications included in famous artists' contracts run the gamut. In the negotiation of any large performance, an artist provides the venue's promoter with a detailed document known as a rider, which meticulously outlines the 'needs' of the talent, contractually binding the venue to oblige.
The fascination with concert riders can be dated back to 1982, during the heyday of American hair metal, with Van Halen's infamous 52-page-long document including the 'M&M' prohibition. Amongst an extensive list of required drinks and munchies, Van Halen's rider requests a bowl of M&Ms, but explicitly warns against the presence of any brown ones. That's right, some poor lackey got the coveted honor of manually removing all of the brown M&Ms from the candy bowl.
Often criticized for being unreasonably excessive, Van Halen's M&M clause set the precedent for the continuation of unruly celebrity demands in the music industry. However, the band insists that the ridiculous specification was a deliberate tool used to gauge the attentiveness of the promoters. Adherence to this small detail was meant to prove whether or not the rider was actually read in its entirety. Eddie and his cohorts claim that if their backstage snack failed to meet the brown-free standard, they would have reason to speculate that more crucial aspects of production -- such as staging, sound and lighting -- could be carelessly overlooked in the same manner. A valid point perhaps counter-intuitively executed.
Catering needs often comprise a good chunk of the concert rider, making promoters aware of various dietary restrictions and comfort foods that artists prefer. Metallica's 2004 rider suggests an enthusiastic love of bacon, demanding (in CAPS, no less) that it be available at every meal during the day. The heavy- metal rockers also get particular about their brand of water (NO EVIAN), and want vegetarian baked beans (Heinz 57) alongside the bacon. At least some of their requirements are environmentally-friendly; they specify that no styrofoam cups be used. Kudos to that, Metallica.
Other strange food demands include 50 Cent's note that there be no beef in the vicinity of his dressing room, Michael Bolton's aversion to onions, Clay Aiken's distinct request that there be "no nuts, mushrooms, coffee, mint, chocolate or shellfish," and perhaps my favorite request of all, Carrot Top's "no carrot cake" stipulation.
Thankfully, some stars recognize how silly the concert rider can be and decide to have a little fun with it. Iggy Pop's 18-page rider, written by The Stooges' roadie Jos Grain, provides the promoter with material that's delightfully entertaining and quirky -- adjectives not routinely associated with contracts. The document is colored with amusing rants about incompetent monitor men and sassy lighting guys. It even includes an addendum outlining a pitch for a kooky reality show entitled "Dead Dog Island," where contestants are presented with a dead canine of their favorite breed, challenged to cook it in six or seven different ways, and then eat it. I would definitely maybe watch this.
In homage to the tone of the Iggy Pop rider, The Foo Fighters deliver their demands in a similarly humorous fashion. Some highlights include the request for four pairs of tube socks, four pairs of boxer shorts (because who doesn't love clean underwear), fresh vegetables with a note exclaiming that cauliflower blows (which it does), and an assortment of various cheeses (next to which appears a declaration that Dave Grohl loves stinky cheese.)
Unfortunately, most concert riders aren't so comical, and asinine demands are given in complete seriousness. Take Katy Perry, for instance. This California girl’s strict rider contains very defined requirements for dressing room décor, including the presence of two cream-colored egg chairs (one with a foot stool), and a refrigerator with a glass door. I guess opening the fridge to see its contents isn't part of this diva's teenage dream. Apparently neither are carnations. She requests some oddly specific flowers, like white and purple hydrangeas, pink and white roses and peonies, white orchids, but NO carnations. God forbid.
But, what's maybe the most frustrating part of Ms. Perry's rider is the section that addresses her chauffeur. It's sternly mentioned that her driver is prohibited from starting any conversations with her, must have their cell phone ringer turned off, and is not allowed to even so much as glance at the backseat through the rearview mirror. Whoa, talk about being a pop princess.
Speaking of music industry royalty, let's talk Britney. Ms. Spears requires a private telephone line for outgoing calls only. In fact, if she receives any unauthorized calls in her dressing room, she reserves the right to impose a fine on the promoter for $5,000. I'm sure those promoters are feverishly praying that no one accidentally dials the wrong number, or else they're out five grand. Oysh, that's a pretty steep price to pay for someone else's chubby fingers.
Jennifer Lopez's demands are also rather over the top. J.Lo's rider specifies that everything in her dressing room be strictly white: couches, chairs, flowers, drapes, everything. Not cream, not ivory, but white. She also asks for an assortment of French diptyque candles- specifically the tuberose and heliotrope blends (whatever those entail.) These Parisian mixtures of wax and perfume go for about $50 a pop, kind of a pricey request to make for the taping of a charity music video, no? I don't think she's still Jenny from the block, because Jenny from the block would probably settle for some matches and a can of air freshener.
Maybe it's the attention from the media that's inflating their egos, maybe it's the multi-platinum record sales, or maybe it's just the fact that they know their crazy demands will be met. But, whatever the reason, pop stars and rock idols continue to demonstrate their flair for the dramatic. TheSmokingGun.com provides an extensive list of insane concert riders, including the pdfs of the original documents. The demands these stars make are pretty far-fetched, but maybe what's more unbelievable is the fact that we're continually willing to comply.
Irony & Group Projects
Gabi. Ross. Dew. The three words that echo in my mind as life’s ironic reminder that things don’t always pan out the way we hope. In fact, things often go in the complete opposite direction of our hopes and dreams, as if asking the universe for a favor is guaranteed to heed the complete reverse result. Like, somehow it always rains on the day of your garage sale even though you made a specific request to the rain Gods to cut you some slack. Or how about that pimple you prayed not to get, conveniently popping up on that special day where photo ops are plentiful and the boy you like asks you to dance, except you have to decline because of the crater that’s engulfed your face.
These are the curveballs that make me afraid of baseball, the unexpected ironies that paint life with that gross pea-soup color that you specifically try to avoid. Life punches the wind right out of us sometimes, hits us right in the gut when we least suspect it. This is an important lesson I learned in second grade, the one I remember with the most clarity. It wasn’t the section on fractions that stuck with me, or the pilgrims on the Mayflower, or even the latest Judy Blume installment. I graduated second grade with a sense of life’s ironic capability to slap little girls in the face while discouraging hitting. The lesson innocently took shape in the form of a class project, a project that began and ended with three words: Gabi, Ross, Dew.
It’s not like I hated group projects ... Okay, no- that’s exactly what it was. I hated them. I know hate’s a strong word, but I’m using it. It very accurately describes how second-grade Gabi felt towards the existence of “the group project.” The teachers would drag on about how working in groups was a good experience; how talking things out with your peers, and having to produce some sad-looking poster or little 3-D diorama in a shoebox was going to make you better in some way. And while part of me knew that they were right, the louder part of me felt that group projects were a mean joke that the teachers got some sick kick out of.
In any case, second-grade me knew that teachers needed a little entertainment and that’s why they made such a spectacle of group projects. But, they’re a part of every school experience- except maybe homeschooling. My point is that they happen, regardless of the general disdain that all students hold for them. Usually, all you can do is hope that you get through each one while you cross your fingers, praying that it’s the last one you’ll ever have.
Well, in Mrs. Miller’s second grade class that I was in every afternoon until 3:15, the group project was suddenly getting serious.
We were being split into pairs, each pair assigned to a specific state of water- so, some groups got steam, or evaporation, or freezing, you get the picture. Thinking back, I can’t believe this was an actual project. But, we were seven and Mrs. Miller was adamant about adhering to the curriculum.
However, she exercised her creativity in other ways. In the twisted teacher-realm of plotting awkward group projects, Mrs. Miller turned it up a notch and made it a “boy-girl” thing. Now, not only were we probably not going to get paired up with our best friend, but we weren’t even going to be working with the same species; we’re talking about second-grade boys here, they were all aliens who had cooties, obviously.
Upon announcing the unexpected twist, my little heart sank and there was a buzz of uncomfortable controversy bouncing around from desk cluster to desk cluster. Some of us were more anxious than others. Hannah Berger, for instance, was thrilled at the thought of working with a boy. She was as much of a slut as any second grader could be, which meant that she wore body glitter and those choker necklaces that are meant to look like tattoos.
As Hannah’s sparkly little eyes surveyed the room and assessed her partner options excitedly, others were just barely holding down their lunch. The ghostly pale, squeaky-voiced Michael Shuster sat at his desk and stared at his pencil, repeatedly swallowing the huge gulp that kept forming in his throat. He didn’t know how to talk to girls. (As the years progressed, it became clear that he really didn’t know how to talk to anyone at all; not girls, not boys, not even the intrusively friendly bus driver.) But, the state of clamminess and sweaty palms that embodied him that day in second grade was representative of how the majority of the class felt: nauseous and unprepared.
There I was, seven years old, being thrown into a world of the unknown: learning about the properties of water alongside a boy, and to top it off, we had to make a poster to present to the class. It’s projects like these that made me wish I could call out sick from school for at least a few weeks. The lucky kids always got mono or strep throat, which guaranteed them a solid month off with no major academic penalties. Of course, being sick would be the major downside to the whole plan, but at age seven all I could think about was how many times in a row I could watch The Lion King and recite every word, beginning to end. Mono seemed completely worth it.
Sitting in class, I was restless at my desk, watching the clock and remembering how glad I was that Mrs. Miller would be giving us a brief snack break, allowing me to gather myself and convene with my best friend, Samantha, to come up with some sort of plan. I wasn’t even thinking about the peanut butter celery sticks that my Mom had packed for me that morning- which, I had been daydreaming about since the bus pulled up to the school hours earlier. But there was no time to eat; Sam and I needed to brainstorm, and fast.
At that stage in our lives, Samantha and I were significantly unfamiliar with how to handle our male classmates. We were experts when it came to the Rugrats and the Spice Girls, but boys were a foreign territory, and so the plan was born out of our instinct to repel the boys in our class, eliminating them as a concern entirely.
The first step was wardrobe. Our daily ensembles consisted of oversized, fleece sweatshirts and boldly patterned leggings. We were convinced that these getups would make the boys think twice before giving us any trouble.
Our crack-head clothing choices were initially instituted in order to stay clear of one second-grade boy in particular: Ross Klein. Out of all the boys in our class, Samantha and I decided that Ross was the most threatening and we were to avoid him at all costs. (Of course this probably meant that we had a crush on him, something our seven-year-old selves would deny emphatically.) Regardless of our reasoning, Ross Klein was our “code red” in the world of girl-boy interaction and being partnered up with him was like being assigned a 16-measure vocal solo in the spring chorus recital that you never signed up for. It was intimidating, anxiety-provoking, and an almost guaranteed way to embarrass yourself.
After snack break ended, we were left with the dizzying reality that it was time to return to our seats and await our doomed, second-grade destiny. My throat was closing up, my upper lip was dotted with sweat and I felt like collapsing into a helpless ball of mush that just wanted her Mommy. But, as Mrs. Miller started to write down the topic choices on the board, it became clear that ‘crying for Mommy’ wasn’t an option.
“Dew”, however, was an option. I stared at the word, listed amongst others such as “Hail”, “Hurricane”, “Blizzard”, all words I had heard before. But, “Dew” was new. I was sure Mrs. Miller had made a mistake. Writing a word on the board that was phonetically reminiscent of a certain, staple, potty-humor term (doo, doodie, doodoo, etc.) was completely out of character for her. Did she not know that the whole class could see that she was writing about poop on the board? Had she forgotten the maturity level of the second grade?
At age seven all I needed to hear was the sound “doo” to know for certain that I could not (I would not) be stuck doing my project on such a strange topic. “Doo,” I repeated to myself under my breath, followed with a furrowed brow and a nervous laugh. Yea, I was not doing my project on dew. Not happening.
That time had finally come and we were being partnered off, boy-girl style, each pair given a huge poster board and a topic, expected to get to it- whatever it was. Mrs. Miller started the slow reveal, really tasting the names in her mouth as the class all clung to the edges of their seats.
“Hannah, Eric, Tsunami.” Hannah shoots a mischievous look towards Eric. The entire class watches as he responds with a goofy, half smile.
“Sarah, David, Avalanche.” Heads turned to see the look on Sarah’s face, then again to see the look on David’s. The tension in the room was high and my patience was low.
“Samantha, Eli, Blizzard.” I looked at Sam, who seemed relieved. Eli was a cool kid, and I had a Beanie Baby named Blizzard, so there’s that. It couldn’t be that bad if there was Beanie Baby to reference.
As she continued calling out names, the list of topics got shorter, as did my potential partner-possibilities. With my fingers crossed as tight as they could go, and my eyes tightly shut in fear, all I could do in that moment was pray. Please don’t let me be partnered with Ross. Please don’t let me get Dew. Please no Ross. Please no Dew. No Ross. No Dew. No Ross. No Dew.
And then it happened. Mrs. Miller introduced me to the sadistic power of irony with the next three words that came out of her mouth: “Gabi, Ross, Dew.” And just like that my world came to a crashing halt, my stomach jumped into my throat, and I began to question the clarity with which I had been praying. Everything I specifically wanted to avoid was exactly what I had to face head on. In the twisted world of the group project, I fell victim to irony and the confusion it inspires regarding personal faith. Who was I even praying to up there?
As the class shuffled around and everyone sat with their partners all I could do was hear the throbbing of my heart and the shortness of my breath. Samantha shot me a look of sympathy, one that said, It’s been fun being best friends, Gab. I hope you survive Ross. I’m so sorry. Also, what’s dew?
I looked back at her with my chubby red cheeks that said, I have no idea what dew is! I can’t work with Ross! Why do all the teachers hate me? You’re so lucky, can we switch? Please, Samantha! I can’t do this! Help a sister out!
But, our silent exchange was cut short as I was exiled from my desk, courtesy of Mrs. Miller’s teaching assistant, Miss Amanda. “C’mon Gabriela, go find your partner.” She made it sound so easy, as if I could just get up and go sit with Ross in a painful silence with the word dew hanging over us, waiting to be addressed. But, I was an obedient little second grader and I stared at Miss Amanda with big eyes full of fear as I got up and gathered my things, as if I was just sentenced to walk the plank and fall into a group of hungry crocodiles.
With my notebook clutched close to my chest, I slowly made my way to the desk cluster where Ross was sitting, awaiting his fate dewy fate. He looked about as enthused as a sick child facing a spoonful of nasty cough medicine, me being the cough medicine that he couldn’t bare to swallow. So I sat down, I avoided eye contact, and I stayed quiet while my head wouldn’t shut up. My mind spun with worry, anxiety spiraling like a mental tornado ready to destroy everything in its path.
“So, what’s dew exactly?” asked Ross, breaking the ice like a pickaxe. He looked at me with anticipation, hoping I knew more about dew than he did. But, I knew nothing about dew. I knew nothing about dew and it turns out I really knew nothing about Ross. Sure, he was scary in the typical way that a second grader fears the opposite sex, but otherwise he seemed tolerable. He wasn’t plotting a mean joke on me involving pig’s blood and a prom dress. He wasn’t calling me fat, at least not aloud. He was simply wondering what the hell dew was and how we were supposed to draw it on a poster.
Ross and I got through the project with minimal, verbal acknowledgement and a silent understanding that we were communicating strictly for the purposes of the poster, not to be mistaken for some sort deliberate, second-grade, social interaction in which we were willingly participating. Both of us were also painfully aware of the fact that we got stuck with the lamest of all the project topics: dew.
Standing in front of the class, holding a poster with a poorly colored illustration of a bathroom sink and a dew-covered mirror, the meaning of irony hit me hard. Not only did we learn about dew, but we also discovered life’s tendency to ignore personal prayers and proceed with ironic gusto, granting wishes in reverse and churning stomachs around the world. Sure, the slap in the face hurt like hell, but the reality was that I would survive. The sting passes and life goes on.
Gabi. Ross. Dew. Those three words hit me like daggers, three stabs that knocked the breath out of my chest and the faith in prayer out of my mind. But, in its place, those three words left me with a taste of reality, the bittersweet flavor of life’s surprises, which I learned, don’t always have to be so scary.
Simply Innate
"Even in humans, psychologists are discovering that women react to some unconscious cues, cues they are unaware of, when responding favorably, or not, to men. In animals, female choice should be seen simply as an innate, evolved response to an indicative secondary sexual cue presented by the male."
-An Introduction to Biological Evolution, page 139
The ultimate goal of most living species is to ensure the continuation of their population. This basic biological fact has been the basis of many scientific theories, including Darwin’s ‘Survival of the Fittest’ and ‘Natural Selection’. Most animals have an instinctual desire to protect their young and make way for future generations. This animalistic priority has held true throughout the history of life, remaining one of the most fundamental, primitive goals.
The concept is simple enough to achieve. A male and female meet, decide to reproduce, and nourish their young until they can start the process all over again. Ostensibly, it’s very cut and dry. An ideal scenario might go like this:
Male: “I want to impregnate you. Let's mate.”
Female: “You look like you have good genes in your sperm. Yea, let's.”
Male: “Wonderful. Our children will live strong, healthy lives and reproduce like bunnies.”
Female: “Great, it’s a deal. Fertilize me, baby.”
END SCENE.
However, due to the unfortunate, complex nervous systems of our species (Homo sapiens), a mess of feelings get in the way: confusion, love, anger, excitement, sadness, jealousy, pride, etc. The spectrum of human emotion is endless, as is our craving to find meaning in everything. So, the volcano that is the human psyche has erupted into an exhausting nightmare of hidden subtext and agonizing connotation. A situation of a common human being, living in the 21st century, might go something like this:
(dramatization)
Guy: “Yoo.”
Girl: “Um, Hi!”
Guy: “You're cute.”
Girl: “Thanks!”
Guy: “I like you.”
Girl: *whispers to herself* “OMG.”
Guy: “Maybe you want to hang out.”
Girl: “Yea, I'd like that!”
Of course, the conversation would vary according to the male and female's respective personalities. (Another result of the wondrous complex nervous system: personality). The female may be the initiator, the male may be the prey, but the situation above seems like a fair representation of our reality, or mine at least.
The dialogue seems quite simple and straight forward, yes?
NO. Every single word is overflowing with subtext and emotion. Here is the situation shown again, but this time with the true meaning:
Guy: “Yo.” (I'd like to tap that)
Girl: “Um, Hi!” (shit a really cute guy is talking to me! I wonder if he likes me for my personality...he must, I mean it couldn't be for my appearance; I'm fat and ugly. What the-- is he staring at my boobs? Look alive girls!)
Guy: “You're cute.” (She's okay, but if I don't say hott, she might think I'm not shallow; it’s my only shot at getting any [action].)
Girl: “Thanks!” (Awww, he didn't say hott. He must not be shallow. A nice, decent guy likes me—eww, should I be alarmed? I only like BAMFS. (bad-ass motha- f***ers) Whatever, take what you can get you ugly, fatso. Girls, look alive! Don't sag. For God's sake you're only [insert age].)
Guy: “I like you.” (Ehh, I like her a little. I'd never actually go out with her, but if I tell her I like her, then maybe she'll go to [insert base] with me tonight. I'm so smooth. You're the bomb [referring to self] my main man...dude...bro...bra.)
Girl: *whispers to herself* “OMG!” (Shit. Did I just whisper to myself? I'm such a f***ing loser. I really like this guy. He's cute, funny, smart and nice to me. There must be something wrong with him. SHUT UP. F***, am I bipolar? NOT THE TIME for questioning your mental stability. FOCUS.)
Guy: “Maybe you want to hang out.” (How about I lure her into my room, use my charm to get us laying down, and get to the business.)
Girl: “Yea, I'd like that!” (Holy shit. He wants me. I love him. I hope he likes me.) CUE VULNERABILITY.
And, so goes the evolution of the human relationship. If we could only do it like the other mammals--- (as the song by Bloodhound Gang goes: "You and me baby ain't nothing but mammals, so let's do it like they do on the Discovery channel.”)
The moral of this expert scientific account on human interaction isn't that the male beings of the species are jerks, because girls can be jerks too; it’s not a matter of girls rule and boys drool. The true conclusion is that the human species is too complex for its own good.
Natural selection has caused our brains to develop, and the repercussions are fatal; suicide rates are up, divorce rates are up, and the amount of broken hearts is too high a number to count. Natural selection has slowly affected the evolution of the mind. We have exceeded the mentality of animals and entered into a world with emotion and thought. Our minds have developed into the complex entities they are now, and we are left in a state of chaos and depression.
Or maybe it's just me.
Maybe we need to take the reins of our potentially omnipotent minds and eliminate the impact of emotion. Maybe we should all be hunters and gatherers forced to fend for ourselves without having to think about money, or status, or even the pursuit of happiness. Maybe it doesn't have to be as complicated as all that. Or, maybe we should all buy an endless supply of tequila and weed.
The end.
And How Does That Make You Feel?
I don’t get it: this whole life thing, living, being alive; this dizzying concept of living creatures inhabiting this massive, spherically shaped ball that floats around in a mysterious, dark space of infinite nothingness. We are nothing more than tiny specs that have been thrown into this immeasurable, vast darkness that has no beginning and no end.
Beginnings make me anxious and endings turn my stomach, but the inability to measure something altogether causes an uneasy sense of helplessness in my gut that I can’t soothe. The restless confusion brought on by the notion of infinity can drive a person crazy.
Even the supposed comfort of uncertainty has its limits. Not knowing what I’m going to wear tomorrow is fine; I can handle that. I can even subscribe to the whole weather thing; leaving the fate of my brown, suede boots in the hands of giant globs in the sky that can decide to release excess water vapor at their leisure. I never know when I’ll need an umbrella or an extra sweater, especially considering the giant shithole in the ozone layer.
It’s all a giant pain in the ass, but I can handle it. However, the vastness of space is an entirely different dubiety to wrap my tired mind around. Think about it: when you become overwhelmed with the frightening possibilities of the unknown, you escape. I usually find refuge in my room, or my car, maybe under a huge rock somewhere. The thing about infinity is that there’s no escaping it. It is everywhere and it is everything. Getting a sense of perspective can usually assuage petty uncertainties. “Think of the big picture”, some idiot will say. But, that’s precisely the problem: the big picture. The “big picture” is that we’re stuck.
It’s a strange type of claustrophobia to feel trapped in infinity, the most colossal of spaces. Maybe it’s reverse claustrophobia: Ortsualcophobia; the technical term (not really).
This sick jigsaw puzzle of existence has been stumping me since day one. I mean that’s when it all starts isn’t it? Suddenly you are a tiny, shriveled up little nugget being man-handled by giants in green gowns who are passing you around like a football. I’m not a complete smartass who thinks she remembers the day she was born, but I’m fairly sure that if babies were immediately rushed from the delivery room into a tell-all interview with Barbara Walters, they would unanimously reveal that the process of being born is just as horrifying for the baby as it is for anyone watching it happen.
I’m angry enough at the asshole who thought it was a good idea to show “The Miracle of Life” in seventh grade, but where do I direct the anger I have from actually having to be a part of it however many years ago. At some point, everyone was that little “miracle” that tested the gag reflexes of middle school students around the world. Everyone was once forced out of the peaceful, warm safe haven that they grew to love for 9 months, only to be held in the middle of a giant room, surrounded by green ninjas who are all too busy smiling and crying to notice that the room is freezing and there are blinding, bright lights shining in your eyes. There’s nothing worse than being naked and not having sunglasses; nothing.
So, a baby has to wonder: what the hell is going on? But, the thing is, the answer isn’t that easy. I’ve spent countless hours trying to make sense of it all. Maybe this is all somebody’s dream and we’re just figments of their imagination. Maybe we’re all just characters in a story being told in another universe. Maybe God is just a student in an astronomy course who had to make a 3D model of the solar system, and we’re just a part of his assignment in a class full of similar projects which all serve as different universes. I think about the meaning of it all, hoping to find some shred of logic that will lead me to understand what I’m doing here. Often, my friend Sabina and I will get really high, open a box of double-stuffed Oreo’s, and write down our theories in hopes that when we sober up the next day we’ll be able to make sense of it and finally solve the mystery of life.
Whatever it may be, I always come to the same conclusion: no one will ever really know for sure. After years of religious day school, and reading different philosophies, and studying biological and evolutionary science, it all seems sort of trivial.
I was always comforted by the possibility of endless adventure and excitement that would come in the search for this abstract answer to life. But, I’m afraid I’ve reached the truth earlier than I wanted. The truth is that there is no answer, and no matter how hard I try to find one and attempt to make sense of this world, I’ll never reach a concrete explanation. Life is what’s happening right now. We are here for a small patch of time and no matter how twisted the whole concept is, it remains our reality. We live, we die, and that’s all that is certain. We eat and sleep in the middle, maybe laugh a bit here and there, shed some tears, get some bruises, and then we go just as suddenly as we came.
It’s kind of a downer.
But, I guess it all depends on if your glass is half empty or half full. Mine, for instance, has been pretty empty for a long time. I don’t want it to be. I’ve asked the waitress on multiple occasions to come and pour me more water, but my glass is still bone dry. Is it really my fault if this place has bad service? I’ve filed my complaints on the little comment cards given out to each table, but there’s still nothing in my glass, it’s empty. I guess I should really just get up and fill the damn glass myself.
Pessimism is exhausting. However, I can’t really imagine life without it. Am I supposed to walk around living in complete bliss and ignore all of the dark truths that the world is drowning in? If happiness means being stupid, I I don’t think I can do it. Stupidity is a common trigger of my negativity.
Just yesterday I was behind these two girls who spent 10 minutes reassuring each other of how thin they were. “You’re so skinny, omigod,” one would say.
“Shut up, no I’m not, you are. I eat so much,” her friend would answer.
“Shut up. I eat so much. It just shows on me. You’re so thin.”
“Shut up. Thanks.”
And so on. To me, they both looked emaciated, and I’m pretty confident in saying that I probably ate more for breakfast than either of them had in days.
The point is, if being happy means walking around comparing jean sizes and looking like a character from a Tim Burton movie, then I want nothing to do with it. So, maybe I’m a downer. However, my name isn’t Debbie, so you’ll have to come up with some other clever alliteration.
Negative words beginning with the letter “G”: gloomy, gray, grimy (although I’d prefer to avoid a nickname involving the word ‘grimy’), grim, glib, ghostly, goblin, gingerbread, grasshopper, gum, golf, garbage man, garage sale, garlic bread. Take your pick. I won’t respond to it, but in the event that Debbie Downer challenges me to some sort of “who-is-more-cynical?” competition, I’m going to need a stage name.
These are the types of things I think about everyday...
But, I didn’t say any of that. I just sat there.
“Well, we’re going to have to stop for today, our time is up,” said Dr. Bazlin, “maybe next week you’ll feel like talking.”
“Okay. Sorry,” was all I could mumble.
“No need to be sorry. Sometimes people have trouble putting their thoughts into words, that’s what you’re here for. Next week at the same time?”
“Sure.”
Putting it into words wasn’t the problem. It's what comes after that: the powerless, defeated look that people had given me so many times. Once I put it into words, my anxiety is only justified further with the sharp truth: there are no real answers, are there?
Concert Cruisin'
After my second time going on a cruise, I decided the whole ‘vacationing-at-sea’ thing was definitely not for me. My seasickness was minimal- tolerable for the most part- and the islands we visited were breathtaking, but there was something about being stranded in the middle of the ocean that didn’t bode well with me.
Maybe it was the emphasis on food and how every day was scheduled around the next meal or visit to the buffet; maybe it had to do with the loud, little kids who peed in the pool or the old geezers lingering around the casino with thick-chained necklaces and chest hair popping out of their shirts. Whatever it was, I adamantly crossed the cruise-boat option off my list of future vacation ideas.
Then, I heard of the “Weezer Cruise”, the concert held on The Carnival Destiny that featured 16 different musical acts who performed over the course of three days on a trip to Cozumel. No, I’m not making this up; it’s a real cruise.
The dream-like surrealism I feel about such an event is probably comparable to the first time a child hears about the existence of Disney Cruise lines- except the exciting possibility of bumping tails with Mickey Mouse and Donald Duck on the Lido deck is, in my case, replaced with the rush and thrill of brushing shoulders with Rivers Cuomo or chatting with Patrick Wilson while we wait on line for chocolate crepes.
It wasn’t until I heard of these floating music festivals/“Rockers at Sea” that I even considered revisiting the possibility of going on another cruise. But the power of rock always prevails- an inevitability to which I’m sure my fellow music-lovers can attest- and now I can’t help but fantasize about the three to five days that I could spend at an all-inclusive, floating music festival, jam-packed with performances, bright lights, drinks and- yes, even a handful of visits to the buffet, I’m sure.
I am fully willing to risk the expansion of my stomach lining if it means getting to embark on this unique concert-cruise with some of my favorite musicians, not to mention the other two thousand passengers who share a love for music and dancing and are hopefully just looking to have a good time.
Of course, there’s always the possibility of crossing paths with those shallow toolbags who wear muscle tees and are more interested in getting laid than in any of the actual music, but there’s got to be some sense of community amongst people who are down to pay three hundred dollars per day for an ongoing rock concert at sea. Knowing there’s at least one common interest uniting us, I would feel significantly less inhibited to start a conversation with the stranger in the elevator whose fanny pack would normally throw me off. If nothing else, we can agree on the sheer awesomeness of being on a music- cruise, this much is undeniable.
The question must be asked though, concerning that special music-festival staple that so embodies the rock and roll persona: yes, drugs. I doubt the security on the music-cruises is more lenient than the security on any other cruise, but one can hope. And who’s to say my expectation of a successful music festival would be met in such an unconventional venue? I mean, children are allowed on board, as are parents and seniors and other stereotypical killjoys that may not approve of some casual, concert drug use.
But, the drinks sound plentiful and the tunes so sweet and I’m sure the rambunctious energy of youth that I love about concerts would guarantee a few crowd-surfing beach balls and some subtle puffs and passes of joints. Hopefully, the mosh-pits wouldn’t get too violent, but what would a concert be without a few bruises and scrapes? And nothing to look at but the sea and sky that surround you? That’s a boat I want to be on.
Forging On Without A Frontman
Forging On Without A Frontman
by Gabriela Kalter
(originally published for www.breakthruradio.com)
It was 1980 when AC/DC released Back in Black, the album of hard rock legacy that went multi-platinum and launched the London-based Australian musicians into international super-stardom. Lead singer Brian Johnson's voice most definitely shook audiences all night long, awaking metal fans to the raw appeal of the band's seventh album. But the thick blackness of the cover art was more than just a bad-ass creative choice, it was a solemn sign of mourning for the former AC/DC frontman, Bon Scott.
Bon Scott died in February of the same year after an excessive night of drinking that culminated in his being left a friend's car, completely passed out and unconscious. It wasn't until the next evening that the friend found a lifeless Scott in his passenger seat, having allegedly suffered from alcohol poisoning and dying by choking on his own vomit.
The death of the 33-year-old AC/DC singer remains a tragic story in '80s hard rock, but as the cliché goes - - the show must go on, and go on it did. With the encouragement of the grieving Scott family, the band enlisted Brian Johnson (formerly of British rock group, Geordie) as the new vocalist and decided to continue making music.
Losing the frontman is an all-too-common occurrence in music, forcing a band to face the challenge of either finding a replacement or breaking up entirely. Whether due to creative differences, death, sickness, or simply a desired change of pace, band members come and go, changing with the tides and tweaking the artistic vibe of the group. Even the beloved Bon Scott was a 1974 replacement for AC/DC's initial frontman, Dave Evans. The band member shift is just a part of the program sometimes, and the struggle to regroup and reidentify is what determines their longevity on the rock and roll timeline.
Though riffs and hairdos may never change -- the ways of contracting a new front man certainly have. Take the American rock group, Boston, for example. These New Englanders saw a period of immense success in the '70s and '80s, making a name for themselves on the classic rock circuit as progressive visionaries with soulful guitar riffs. The talented Brad Delp fronted the band, with occasional support from vocalist Fran Cosmo. But, in 2007, Delp committed suicide in his New Hampshire home by carbon monoxide poisoning. The rest of the band was obviously in mournful shock, unsure of how to proceed.
Without the lead singer, a band is inevitably never going to be the same. Some musicians would take it as a sign, pack up their equipment and move on, but the remaining members of Boston trudged on. With the combined pipes of Michael Sweet (of the Christian glam metal band, Stryper) and Tommy DeCarlo, an admiring fan named whom Boston-founder Tom Scholz heard through MySpace, the band continued touring. Eventually, Sweet left to return to his musical labor of love, Stryper. But, after the heartfelt tribute concert to Brad Delp, it was clear that Boston wasn't done rocking.
Unfortunately, not all bands that lose their frontman are so quick to reassemble. In fact, the younger the band, the less willing they seem to forge on. The Cali-based ska punk band, Sublime, still hasn't quite recovered from the death of singer Brad Nowell. It was 1996 when Nowell died from a heroine overdose at age 28. Just hours before Sublime was scheduled to play a sold out show, drummer Bud Gaugh found the singer dead in his San Francisco motel room. The remaining two members sort of fizzled out, falling back into their excess lifestyles of getting high and dazing off. Not until 2009 did they attempt some sort of reunion, recruiting Rome Ramirez as their new frontman. But, Nowell's family sued the group for trademark infringement, forbidding them from using the name "Sublime."
If having to change their name to "Sublime with Rome" wasn't discouragement enough, it probably didn't help that the attitudes of Sublime fans were apprehensive and resistant to accept the new musical venture. It often occurs in instances such as these, where a group tries to reintroduce or recreate themselves with a new lineup, that audiences aren't receptive to the unfamiliar. Regardless of the fact that Brad Nowell would have probably wanted his friends to keep making music and having fun, fans of the classic Sublime lineup usually frown on any attempts to resurface.
In speaking of staple '90s rock acts from California, Blind Melon also suffered the loss of a 28-year-old frontman. Singer-songwriter Shannon Hoon died in 1995 from a cocaine overdose. His band mates found him on their tour bus and called the authorities upon being unable to wake him up.
It took over a decade for the band to come together again, grappling to find the right voice for their sound, a voice Hoon would approve of. In 2006 they hired singer Travis Warren as their frontman, and released For My Friends in 2008, their first album in over 12 years. Since then, however, Warren has left the group to pursue a solo career.
The classic pursuit of the solo career is one of the most popular reasons why the frontman leaves the band, it's not always a tragic death that prompts the appearance of a replacement singer. The classic tale of Black Sabbath exemplifies the trope. The '70s saw the British rockers' rise to fame, led by the wacky presence of frontman Ozzy Ozbourne. After about a decade of sowing the seeds for everything we know today as heavy metal, Ozbourne left the group in 1979 to go solo.
His own name garnered clout, eventually outshining his former Black Sabbath mates. They brought in several singers to replace Ozzy, but none of them seemed to last long. Ronnie James Dio (then of early metal band, Rainbow) lasted until 1982, when he decided to go solo as well. Dio reunited with the band several times over the years, but he was temporary replaced by Ian Gillan, then Glen Hughs (both of Deep Purple), and then Roy Gillan (of Badlands).
The often incestual relationships between '70s hard rock groups like Deep Purple and Rainbow was evident in the frequent band-hopping of various members, namely frontmen. Ian Gillan left his position as frontman of Deep Purple to do one album with Black Sabbath. Rainbow's Joe Lynn Turner took over the vocals of Deep Purple along with David Coverdale, who later went on to form his band, Whitesnake.
Val Halen is also a famous participant in the game of musical chairs. In 1984, the only Van Halen frontman anyone cared about, David Lee Roth, quit the band to go solo and was replaced by Sammy Hagar. But, after tensions between Hagar and Halen grew too large, Hagar was replaced with Gary Cherone (of rock group, Extreme), leaving Hagar to return to his solo career. Val Halen reunited with Hagar in 2003, but then left before 2007 when the band finally reunited with Roth. The original lineup seems to be working since they've been touring ever since.
The rotation of frontmen made Van Halen look like a baseball team - constantly in play with a sort of drafting or recruiting process. Sometimes, though, there are more valid reasons (other than wanting to go solo) for a frontman to leave their group.
The Canadian group Barenaked Ladies was a commercial powerhouse of alternative rock in the 1990s and early 2000s, but the last decade hasn't been nearly as kind to founding members Ed Robertson and Steven Page. After getting arrested in 2008 for drug charges, Page officially stepped down in 2009 as the band's lead singer, handing the mike over to Robertson, who was recovering from a plane crash he endured less than a year earlier.
I guess the music isn't always the priority, and appropriately so in the case of Justin Hawkins. The former frontman of the British glam rock band, The Darkness, decided to leave the group in 2006 so he could continue his drug rehabilitation. The remaining members reformed into a group called Stone Gods, allowing their former mate to adequately recover for their reunion last year.
Even though the love of music brings bands together, it isn't always strong enough to hold them. When a lead singer leaves, it's akin to losing a limb or a major organ, assuming the band is the human body. The dynamic shifts, the sound changes and the fans are bound to get judgmental of any attempts to deviate from the comfortable and familiar.
Sometimes a band gets lucky and replaces their frontman with an uncannily skilled singer from a tribute band. Such is the case with Journey and Judas Priest. Other times, it forces a band to retire, like The Troggs. They can try to reform but make little progress like The Talking Heads post-David Byrne or Lynyrd Skynyrd and replace their original singer, Ronnie Van Zandt, with a new Van Zant brother on vocals.
Whether the group is disbanded due to a death like in The Doors, The Cars, and Queen, or because of frontman getting fired like in Pink Floyd, Iron Maiden, and The Stone Temple Pilots-- rock and roll, if nothing else, is often free of reason. No matter how a group perseveres in their vision, the drive to push on in the face of adversity is totally admirable, even if it doesn't always sound the greatest.
Why We Gotta Catch 'Em All!
Why We Gotta Catch 'Em All!
by Gabriela Kalter
(originally published for www.breakthruradio.com)
I never really got into Yu-Gi-Oh or Dragon Ball-Z. I liked Sailor Moon, she was pretty cool. But, of all the anime cartoons that saturated my childhood, I've got to give the medal to the one that fueled the continued artform: Pokémon. More than just an animated television series, or a trading card fad, or the original video game, Pokémon somehow defied specific categorization because it managed to conquer such a multitude of cultural mediums. It could probably qualify for some kind of mention in a History textbook or something.
If not a History textbook, then Pokémon (at the very least) deserves to appear in some nostalgic, epic scrapbook documenting the pop culture milestones/icons of my past. What's interesting about the special place that Pokémon holds in my heart is that I'm not much of a gamer or an anime fanatic. My love for Pokémon stems from a broader appreciation for the connectedness and sense of community that it inspired. The show infiltrated school cliques and adolescent social tiers and brought us all together in an effort to catch 'em all and be the very best, like no one ever was.
Pokémon was marketed as a phenomenon from the very beginning, since the introduction of the Japanese creation in the United States circa 1998. Created by video game designer Satoshi Tajiri in 1996, Pokémon was first introduced in Japan as a game-link-cable video game called Pocket Monsters.
The game is inspired by Tajiri's childhood hobby of collecting insects as well as the popular activity of capturing Asian crickets and then training them to fight each other.
The goal of the RPG was to climb the ranks as a Pokémon trainer, eventually collecting all 151 Pokémon creatures. Sold in two versions, the Red pack and the Blue pack, the only way for players to collect all of the Pokémon was to link up with a gamer who had the opposite color pack. So even from the get go, The Pokémon Company utilized a very strong merchandising strategy to ensure the kinds of sales that would launch the brand into an international craze.
When Pokémon was introduced in the U.S., the television show came before the Nintendo video game. It debuted on Sept. 9, 1998 and the Game Boy RPG was released on Sept. 28, 1998. The role-playing, adventure game became the fastest selling Game Boy title in Nintendo product's 10-year history and was in such high demand that many electronic chains and gaming stores experienced inventory shortages and completely sold out of the game the same day it arrived. The success of the TV show spurred a demand for Pokémon toys which launched Hasbro Inc. into industry success despite difficulties in keeping up with the demand for more Pokémon products.
In other words, kids loved this shit. We ate it up like chocolate. It was our crack, and it reached a much broader demographic than the intended audience of 6-12 year old boys. It appealed to young girls, teenagers, and to non-gamers who didn't necessarily have a taste for anime.
The show centers on Ash Ketchum, a 10-year old living in the Kanto region who sets out to become a Pokémon trainer. Through various battles and defeats, Ash aims to win Gym Badges and add more Pokémon (Pocket Monster) to his collection. Along with his first Pokémon, Pikachu (a cute, little, yellow nugget monster with a squeaky voice and rosy cheeks), and former Gym Leaders, Brock and Misty, Ash embarks on a journey that would last throughout over 600 episodes and 13 spin-off movies.
The success of the show is no joke. Just ask my friend Didi from temple. Didi had one of those Grandma's that bought her presents constantly. There were many times where she would be showing off some new toy that she got as a "Friday afternoon gift," as if that were normal. As if getting a present on a Friday "just because" was something routinely experienced at Didi's.
In any case, she started collected Pokémon cards and would put them in a three ring binder full of protective sleeves -- you know the ones. As her collection grew and she got all three stages of Bulbasour and Charmander, I knew this thing was becoming huge.
After convincing my parents to indulge my impulse-buy for a few packs of Pokémon cards at the counter of virtually every store with a hunger for easy sales in the early 2000s, I started my own collection. My brother and I woke up at 6 a.m. every day and made sure to catch the show before heading off to camp or school. We would set up our breakfast in front of the TV and sing along to the theme in giddy excitement of the adventures that would unfold in the 22 minutes to follow.
If being an early bird in grade school doesn't scream dedication, I don't know what does. Frankly, I'm so impressed with my 8-year-old self for waking up at such an early hour I wonder if this would be an effective wake up strategy for adult life. Whatever gets you out of bed in the morning, am I right?
As my card collection grew and I got more holographic Pokémon to show off, with all the pretty colors and shininess, I felt purposeful. It was comforting to be a part of a craze that helped connect me with kids on the school bus who were looking to trade a Squirtle for a Jigglypuff, or a Clefairy for a Zubat. Heck, to be honest, I'm sure I got taken advantage of and was had in some unfair trades, but I was just so happy to be a part of it all.
In the name of being sincere, I must admit something that puts me at risk for being a poser or a fake, but that speaks to the massive appeal of the Pokémon craze. Even though I collected the cards, watched the show religiously, played Pokémon Snap on N64 and had a huge crush on Brock, I never fully understood how the whole thing worked. I didn't know how to actually play the card game, I just liked to look at the pictures and trade with my newfound friends. I didn't know why there were so many energy cards that seemed so useless to me, or why the numbers on each card had an effect on winning battles or whatever. It was never about that for me.
Maybe it's super lame of me for loving Pokémon despite not knowing the intricate details of how to become a Pokémon Trainer and gain Gym Badges. But, my ignorance doesn't delegitimize my appreciation for the pop culture hit. My love for the phenomenon is completely genuine and traceable throughout my childhood, allowing my brother and I to bond over breakfast every morning and giving me something to talk about with the kids on the bus.
Despite some reported seizures in children who watched the show and had epileptic reactions to the fast paced images and flashing lights in the series, Pokémon has had a largely positive effect on its young viewers. It encourages the Japanese values of empathy and perseverance. An article in the LA Times states, "Although "Pokémon" has been accused of fostering gambling, un-Islamic conduct and Darwinism, the series and games stress friendship and good sportsmanship. When a player wins, it's not a glorious victory but a testament to his exceptional bond with his Pokémon. In the series, Ash never allows anyone to mistreat a Pokémon, and he learns self-sacrifice when he permits his Butterfree to find a mate and depart for their nesting grounds."
The show promotes the importance of pushing yourself to be your best (just listen to the theme song) and to evolve as stronger and more competent then when you started. It offers a very healthy image of progression and the importance of hard work.
One day Didi came running out of the coat closet clutching her binder of Pokémon cards in tears. Pokémon was far more powerful than any unsuspecting grandma's thought it would be when buying their grandkids that infamous "Friday afternoon gift." Didi was frantic because someone has stolen her Charizard card, the holographic third stage Pokémon that completed the Charmander evolution. It was like a family heirloom had been taken, like her innocence and faith in mankind was shaken to the core. That's when I knew this was much more serious than another passing childhood fad. This was a lasting and invested sort of fandom.
Kids had to catch them all, and sometimes that meant resorting to stealing. Of course, Didi's Grandma bought her like eight more Charizard cards by the next weekend, but the point is the blind dedication to collecting these things. Pokémon was a craze and it made us crazy. I still can't believe I ever got up at 6 a.m. with energetic anticipation to watch a cartoon. But, that's the beauty of Pokémon. It was a mania and a staple of childhood that will always hold a special place in my heart. Plus, how cute was Brock!?